Search for: "John Does, I-IX"
Results 1 - 20
of 210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 4:02 pm
Consider John Doe's argument in favor of pseudonymity: [I.] [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
But, I’m not writing today to bash John Cusack. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
But, I’m not writing today to bash John Cusack. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 4:13 am
Most of us take for granted that pseudonymous litigants will use the name “John Doe” or “Jane Roe,” but that gives rise to a problem. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
John's University, issued on January 31. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 11:11 am
The complainant, Jane Roe, alleged that the sex was not consensual; the respondent, John Doe, insisted that it was. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:25 am
The relevant language of Title IX does not materially differ from the language of Title VII. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 4:39 am
If I haven’t mentioned it in a while, K.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
" Outside of John Doe, Jane Doe, and Sue Roe, the complaint identifies almost every other individual with initials…. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 12:10 pm
Columbia University, a male Columbia student calling himself John Doe alleged that he had been wrongly suspended for sexual assault, in violation of Title IX and other laws. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:29 pm
Breyer joined Chief Justice John G. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:21 am
Doe sued the university under Title IX and the two students—who had then been co-Presidents (consuls?) [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:58 pm
I’ll detail these injustices, in my next post on this subject in a few days. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:29 am
If you find it troubling, so do I. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 12:08 pm
John M. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:08 pm
Richmond and Steele agree with me (John perhaps a little more strongly than Doug), and I’m glad for the company. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:23 am
(Randy Barnett) I am prepared to believe Jonathan’s report that John Roberts has done this before. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:44 am
But then comes an even more unusual kicker, turning the case from merely outrageously unfair to John Doe to a flagrant demonstration of anti-male bias in the execution of Title IX. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:17 am
MIT, by Judge Bruce Selya, joined by Judges Rogeriee Thompson and Gustavo Gelpi (note that I submitted an amicus brief in the case, in support of neither side): [I.] [read post]
